attendance with notifications
Across the studies included in the primary meta-analysis, pooled attendance was 67% for people receiving electronic text notifications.
Text reminders have evidence behind them in healthcare settings. That does not guarantee the same outcome in every service business, but it gives a useful reason to test a consistent reminder process.
Published and checked October 5, 2026
Across the studies included in the primary meta-analysis, pooled attendance was 67% for people receiving electronic text notifications.
The pooled attendance rate was 54% for control groups that received no notification.
The review reported a pooled no-show rate of 15% for notification groups.
The pooled no-show rate was 21% for groups receiving no notifications.
The safest takeaway is operational: reminders can be worth testing when missed appointments are a recurring problem. Measure your own baseline and compare it with your results after introducing a consistent process.
Make the appointment date, time and rescheduling path clear when the booking is created.
Choose a reminder schedule that fits your customers instead of relying on staff memory.
Compare booked appointments, cancellations and no-shows before and after the reminder routine.
Original source: BMJ Open — Using digital notifications to improve attendance in clinic. The 2016 systematic review included 26 articles; 21 studies were included in its primary meta-analysis comparing electronic text notifications with no notifications.
This evidence comes from healthcare settings and should not be treated as direct proof of the same effect in salons, trades or other service businesses. VARELIOX uses it to support testing a reminder process, not to promise a particular reduction in no-shows.
See the related problem page for free reminder steps, a simple booked-revenue-at-risk estimate and one clearly disclosed SMS option.
Explore the Appointment No-Shows Guide →